All articles
Blog

Advantage+ or manual campaigns on Meta: what 640 incrementality tests say

Advantage+ isn’t automatically better. Across 640 incrementality tests run by Haus over 18 months, Advantage+ campaigns beat manual ones in only 42% of cases, and 58% of brands got better incremental returns from manual. But Advantage+ often wins in the short term. Here’s how to read these results.

Key takeaways

  • Advantage+ beats manual in 42% of 640 Haus tests; 58% of brands get better incremental ROI from manual.
  • Advantage+ is +9% at the test midpoint, but −12% by the end, and drives 17% less lift after the campaign.
  • Advantage+ over-reports its own results by about 12 points versus its real impact.
  • Advantage+ still makes sense to launch fast, with little management time and a strong creative library.
  • The right answer: test both with incrementality measurement, not Meta’s reported ROAS.

What Advantage+ is

Advantage+ bundles Meta’s automations: targeting, placements, budget and sometimes creative are handed to the algorithm. Advantage+ sales campaigns (formerly “Advantage+ Shopping”) are the flagship format. With the Andromeda engine, Meta is pushing advertisers hard toward these automated campaigns.

The Haus study: 640 tests, 18 months

Haus, an incrementality measurement specialist, analysed 640 experiments across very different brands, from DTC mid-market to enterprise, with average Meta spend just over $1 million a month. Incrementality measures what ads actually added in sales, compared with a group that didn’t see them.

Advantage+ vs manual (Haus, 640 tests)

42%Tests Advantage+ wins
+9%Advantage+ at midpoint
−12%Advantage+ at the end
−17%Post-campaign lift

How to interpret these results

Advantage+ sprints, manual goes the distance. Automation quickly finds the easiest buyers, some of whom would have bought anyway. Over time, better-controlled manual campaigns reach more new customers.

Reported ROAS flatters Advantage+ more. Haus measures about 12 points of over-reporting versus real impact. If you compare both campaign types in Ads Manager, you mechanically favour Advantage+.

When to choose which

Advantage+ or manual?

Advantage+Manual
Management timeLowHigher
Fast launch
Audience controlLimitedFull
Long-term incremental performanceLower on averageBetter in 58% of cases
Best forShort promos, large cataloguesNew customer acquisition

Our method

Run both in parallel with the same creatives, and exclude existing customers from the Advantage+ campaign to limit cannibalisation. Judge on cost per new customer (from your CRM or store), not Ads Manager ROAS. And whatever the campaign type, creative quality makes the difference: the best often come from your organic posts that work.

Frequently asked questions

Is Advantage+ better than manual campaigns?

Not systematically: in Haus’s 640-test study, Advantage+ wins only 42% of the time, and 58% of brands get better incremental returns from manual.

Why does Advantage+ look better in Ads Manager?

Because it over-reports its results by about 12 points according to Haus: some attributed sales would have happened without the ads.

When should you use Advantage+?

To launch fast, for short promotions or large catalogues, and when you have little time to manage campaigns.

Does Perroly manage Advantage+ campaigns?

Not yet: Meta ads management is in the works at Perroly.

Sources

  1. Haus — The Meta Report: Lessons from 640 Haus Incrementality Experiments
  2. AdExchanger — For Meta Marketers, Automation Isn’t Always The Advantage (But It’s Complicated)